I agree with Daniel Craig: we don’t need a female James Bond

Natasha Pszenicki
WEST END FINAL

Get our award-winning daily news email featuring exclusive stories, opinion and expert analysis

I would like to be emailed about offers, event and updates from Evening Standard. Read our privacy notice.

Glancing at a headline yesterday which read “Daniel Craig does not believe James Bond should be a woman”, I found myself instinctively going into feminist defence mode.

This despite the fact I have never been interested in the Bond franchise — when I see 007 it registers little more than a telephone area code — I felt the need to die on the slightly intellectually lazy hill that it is absolutely integral to the emancipation of women that we are able to play archaic, misogynistic and somewhat boring film characters.

When I read the actual article, however, it turns out Craig was making a much more nuanced point which had been misrepresented. Speaking to Radio Times, he said that “there should simply be better parts for women and actors of colour”.

Here’s what he actually said. “Why should a woman play James Bond when there should be a part just as good as James Bond, but for a woman?” After Craig’s comments a few years ago that he would rather “slash his wrists” than do another Bond film, I should have known he wouldn’t be taking up the mantle that we must preserve the sacred masculinity of the franchise for the sake of tradition.

His argument is actually a pretty compelling one. Instead of trying to crowbar a woman into this role, he is arguing that an original character better than James Bond should be written for a woman, creating space to carve out a new cultural phenomenon on par with Bond.

I do understand the allure of wanting women to be able to play iconic characters, but something about ‘Jane Bond’ does feel lazy and uncreative.

I am just not particularly fussed about taking a chauvinistic male character and having a woman play it — we are better and far more interesting than that.

Having said that, seeing the hilarious uproar about the casting of a black female 007 in the latest Bond film No Time to Die, maybe it would be worth having a female Bond purely to see the reaction.

I personally find Bond a tired narrative so for me the most entertaining thing about it wouldn’t be the film itself but the defensive howls of outrage it would provoke. I would certainly get the popcorn out for that.

What do you think about the idea of a female James Bond? Let us know in the comments below.

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in