Go-fast Kwasi is taking a leap of faith even Indiana Jones would shrink from

Natasha Pszenicki
Stephen King @KingEconomist26 September 2022
WEST END FINAL

Get our award-winning daily news email featuring exclusive stories, opinion and expert analysis

I would like to be emailed about offers, event and updates from Evening Standard. Read our privacy notice.

Afficionados of Indiana Jones will know exactly which sequence provides the perfect accompaniment to Kwasi Kwarteng’s Growth Plan announced last Friday. Towards the end of Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade, when Jones has to cross an unbridgeable crevasse he does so by stepping out with a leap of faith into the void. As his supposedly dying father says — to the audience, not Indy, who is too far away to hear — “you must believe”.

Jones, of course, crosses with no great difficulty. Whether our Chancellor of the Exchequer will be quite so fortunate is debatable. Like Jones, Kwarteng has made a leap of faith. Like Jones, he is hoping that a hitherto-invisible bridge will prevent him from plunging into the economic void.

Kwarteng is certainly right to lament the loss of economic momentum over the last decade or so. But headwinds in the form of an ageing population and an absence of decent productivity growth have been tricky to reverse either because the required policies were controversial — higher immigration rates for people of working age — or, in the case of productivity performance, because the required magic powers were in short supply.

These headwinds, however, are what Kwarteng will have to overcome if he is to meet his growth objective. The idea is for the UK economy to reach a 2.5 per cent annual real growth target, a radical reacceleration compared with the 1.1 per cent average recorded since the pre-Global Financial Crisis peak.

The ambition might seem admirable but it’s difficult to think of any relatively wealthy country that has managed such a remarkable transformation. And the policies now being adopted are hardly without risk.

Take the increase in government borrowing (which, disturbingly, the Office for Budget Responsibility has not been asked to opine on). If we were in Eighties Germany rather than 2020s UK, the central bank would have had no hesitation in whacking interest rates up to much higher levels to limit the inflationary consequences of excessive fiscal stimulus.

Will the Bank of England be so bold? Perhaps not if, first, such actions are seen to undermine the growth target, second, the Government claims that its fiscal stimulus will reduce rather than raise inflation (thanks to the energy subsidy) and, third, the Bank itself has persistently argued that our latest dose of inflation is only temporary.

Or consider the judgment of financial markets. The UK now has a whopping balance of payments deficit. It’s another way of saying additional government borrowing depends, other things equal, on the “kindness of strangers”, as described by former Bank Governor Mark Carney. Foreigners are already funding a huge gap between our domestic savings and domestic borrowings: Kwarteng’s policies, other things equal, will make that gap wider.

That makes both sterling and the gilt market vulnerable. The former implies higher import prices and, thus, a worsening of domestic inflationary conditions while the latter implies higher borrowing costs for companies, for households and, of course, the Government. And, if inflation worsens, the Bank of England will become twitchy. The idea that monetary and fiscal policy can be kept entirely separate in these circumstances, as some economists have argued, is frankly nonsense.

To be fair, you might say Kwarteng is only re-establishing good Thatcherite principles: she, after all, pushed for lower taxes, faster productivity growth and a more dynamic, entrepreneurial economy. Yet unlike Kwarteng, she didn’t try to achieve everything in a 25- minute speech. Her first term in office was aimed primarily at the defeat of inflation. Her second term delivered privatisation and reform of the unions. The centrepiece of her third term was Nigel Lawson’s 1988 tax-cutting Budget. That simply wouldn’t have been credible in her first term: indeed, Geoffrey Howe’s 1981 Budget was one of the toughest on record.

Liz Truss, Kwasi Kwarteng and the rest of a newly installed Cabinet are aiming for re-election by January 2025 at the latest. Selling a dream before then of ever-rising prosperity might make good political sense. Whether voters and financial markets are ready to believe — in line with Jones Senior’s wise counsel — is another matter altogether.

Stephen King (@kingeconomist) is HSBC’s Senior Economic Adviser and author of Grave New World (Yale)

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in